It’s been a much brighter day today. So, I weighed anchor and headed over to the Jolly Roger pub for a nice fish lunch and a think. A problem with Arthurian studies is that whilst Arthur is mentioned in early British source, such as the Annales Cambriae and Nennius, he is not mentioned in the equivalent English sources such as Bede and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles. Worst of all, Arthur is not mentioned by the academic Briton Gildas who was born within living memory of the Battle of Badon, which Arthur allegedly won.
Mind you, each side omits mention of many heroes of the other, so this line of argument doesn’t get us much further towards establishing the nature of the conflict in which Arthur was deposed.
However, as I have said, John Morris noticed a possible overlap between English and British records. He saw that the British poem about the loss of Geraint, and possibly even Arthur, at the ‘warship port’, could be about the same event as the English description of an attack on Portchester found in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles attributed to the year 501 AD:
Note: there's been a lot of dispute about whether 'Port' was a person or a mangled geographical reference to Roman 'portus' or British 'porth' - ie this was really about Bieda and Maegla landing at a port and the scribes having to find some 'English' explanation for the name of the place where they arrived.
“Port came to Britain with his two sons, Bieda and Maegla, and two ships to the place Portsmouth, and killed a young British man, a very noble man.”
Anyhow, let's assume there's a nugget of truth, as there is in many of the ASC entries. We’ve already looked at an entry in the Annales Cambriae that claims Arthur fell at the Battle of Camlann in 537.
The entry for 509 in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles informs us about St Benedict’s death. We know from other sources that St Benedict died in 547 AD. We also know that the early dates in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles were approximated when the oral records were transcribed. I suspect and other have reported there was also some stretching of events backwards to disguise the British successes that culminated in Badon.
Logically then, it might be reasonable to suggest the English attack on Portchester occurred approximately 38 years after the date given in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles ie in 539, which would make it about the same time that the Annales Cambriae claim Camlann occurred.
The entries in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles that follow the Portchester entry tell of how Cerdic (who interestingly has a British name), the founder of Wessex and England, started to break out of the original English held territories. In other words, the events of these few years describe a change in the balance of power in favour of the English. This would fit well with the end of a British golden age of peace.
Given we located an ancient British ‘Cam’ site (settlement in the bend) within a mile of Portchester Castle with easy access to the sea, this a potentially viable start point to follow Arthur’s escape route to Avalon.
Although no one else, to my knowledge has suggested the Battle of Camlann occurred at Portsmouth, others have reached similar conclusions about the general location of Arthur's last battle...
But , I must finish this delicious – and highly recommended – fish...